Phase began in 2003 with a national survey (i.e. the demand analysis, DA) conducted by the task force using a questionnaire. A total of 91 stakeholders in Lusaka, Copperbelt, Eastern and Southern Provinces were interviewed by a team of graduates (from the University of Zambia) under the supervision of the task force. Members of this appraisal team were trained in genetic resources policy issues to accomplish this activity successfully. The survey concentrated on respondents who were from areas outside the capital and this was one of the strengths of this survey.

In addition, the GRPI Office provided technical backup throughout this first phase. For example, it supported the travel of Dr. Walter de Boef of the Biodiversity and Institutional Development Consultancy (BIDC) to work with the task force and train the appraisal team to conduct the interviews. BIDC also worked closely with the task force members in the data analysis and in the writing of the DA's national report.

This document served as the basis for a national workshop held in Lake Kariba, Siavonga, in December 2003, with the attendance of approximately 50 representatives from different sectors.

The GRPI Phase II proposal entitled “Developing Capacity to Formulate and Implement Effective and Equitable Policies for the Use of Genetic Resources in Zambia” was submitted by the task force in April 2004. It was presented to and approved by the ISC.

GRPI-Zambia Phase II

Phase 2 activities were launched officially in November 2005 during an 'orientation' workshop, in which the task force created awareness of Phase 2 in Zambia. The task force received valuable feedback during the workshop for the implementation of the three project components highlighted below.

Awareness creation on the contribution and value of local genetic
resources and related knowledge.
Rights of ownership, control and access to GRFA.
Promoting incorporation of traditional varieties and breeds in local
production systems.

To date these activities are under implementation with various achievements and set backs being realised as well. Information gathered under component I is used to develop awareness raising material on the importance of local genetic resources. A paper to provide recommendations and guidelines on how a process of policy or legal development should be undertaken in the context of genetic resources policy reform is expected to be produced. The provision of recommendations regarding pattern of rights and obligations to be taken into account when defining rights of ownership, control and access to GRFA will also form part of the paper. In addition, a baseline survey of information relating to traditional crop varieties and breeds has also been undertaken and a review of laws and policies affecting local genetic resources is being conducted with the major focus being the identification and analysis of existing legal and policy frameworks applicable to the varieties and breeds identified in the baseline survey.

Phase II activities which have featured prominently throughout 2006, will advance to fruitition in early to mid 2007 as the project prepares to wind up activities.